Joshua Kaufman & Anitra Pavka: Keeping me (More) Honest
In the past, I've improved Zen Haiku based Joshua Kaufman's postings on his web log or comments on mine. I may even be dragged kicking and screaming into using <cite> for citations and the <abbr> tag for abbreviations like CSS. I'm not clear why I'm a big fan of structural markup when it comes to headlines but not abbreviations.
So just now it occurred to me on reading Joshua Kaufman's mention [03/25/2004 - link removed] of a CHI-WEB posting by Cindy Lu about required form fields that I did not indicate which fields commenters must fill out. I like the Movable Type default of requiring Name and Comment and either Email or URL.
So now I am indicating which fields are required for a comment to be allowed. I like the word "required" more than the "*" marking.
I wonder how many usability web loggers have bothered to run usability tests on their own web logs. I know I haven't. Now that I have a search on the site it could be fun.
Switching gears slightly from usability to accessibility (that word is hard to spell right), Anitra Pavka is the accessibility site I visit the most. She linked to the Wave 3.0 alpha accessibility tool just as I started making Zen Haiku more accessible.
Posted by Chad Lundgren on Monday, January 13, 2003 (Link)
Posted by Blaine Monday, January 13, 2003 at 12:13 PM
I believe in regards to why you use some proper CSS and some out dated stuff is probably what you are used to. I know with me I'm always using the [b] tag instead of using "proper" CSS.
Posted by Joshua Kaufman Monday, January 13, 2003 at 02:06 PM
Thanks, Chad. If your looking into using the cite tag, you may want to read Mark Pilgrim's entry in which he explains how the cite tag will soon become semantically obsolete.
http://diveintomark.org/archives/2003/01/13.html#semantic_obsolescence
By the way, don't forget to check your Preview and Error template forms. I had some difficulty leaving this comment without my email.
Posted by Rotwang Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 10:12 AM
Why *require* names and e-mail addresses on an unauthenticated web site? That's a bit silly.
Posted by Chad Lundgren Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 11:53 AM
It tends to improve comment quality since people have to make the effort to fill out the email address, real or not. Besides, people's fake email addresses are kind of a verbal Rorschach test.
Posted by Rorschach Wednesday, January 15, 2003 at 05:25 PM
Fake e-mail addresses say nothing about anyone.
By the way, when I click "preview" the resulting page gives me an empty comment form. I then have to hit my "back" button and click "post" or my message is lost.
Posted by karen Thursday, January 30, 2003 at 09:29 PM
Actually, you should use the tag for acronyms like CSS. The tag is is for abbreviations, such as Blvd for Boulevard.
Most Popular
- Seattle Sunset background image
- Usability applied to life
- Is "My Bad" Bad?
- Free Password Previewing Tool version 2.3 (146 Kb)
- Sunset in New Mexico background picture
- Bath and Body Works
- Atkins.com: Lose the Table Fat
General
Other Web Logs
Categories
- Adminstrative: 11 entries
- General: 51 entries
- Personal: 2 entries
- Photography: 13 entries
- Poetry: 8 entries
- Usability: 71 entries
Archives
- October 2006
- February 2006
- July 2005
- June 2005
- March 2005
- December 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
- May 2003
- April 2003
- March 2003
- February 2003
- January 2003
- December 2002
- November 2002
- October 2002
- September 2002
- August 2002
- July 2002
- June 2002
- May 2002
Unless otherwise expressly stated, all work on this site including photos, poems, and web logs entries are licensed under a Creative Commons License.